Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

London 2012 - The People's Olympics... Really?

17 posts in this topic

Posted

They're describing it as the "People's Olympics". Does anyone really believe that after seeing half empty stadia because the corporate whores never showed up to sit in the seats reserved for them (yet there are still queues of people outside unable to see events, people that would apparently have been happy to pay the extortionate ticket prices)... and after all the corporate sponsorship/advertising...

OK, if it's the People's Olympics... stage it in Liberia, Bangladesh, or Palestine... and make the Olympic brand untouchable, unavailable for sponsorship in any way shape or form...

Make me believe in it.

If you can't do that, call it what it is... The Coca Cola Olympics. Do you think we're stupid?

Yes, you could describe it as the People's Olympics, if only for the fact it's costing the weary British people/tax payer tens of billions of pounds to build a corporate advertising vehicle, at a time hospital trusts are going bankrupt.... with no tangible benefit to the people, aside from some mythical notion it's regenerating 'something, somewhere' in what is the arse end of some distant city most of the 'people' can't even afford to visit.

Pffft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The peoples olympics.

I think not. The poor suffering people will have to foot the bill for it though. In the meantime the fat cat contractors have got rich off the contracts dished out for the games.

Off topic: I see there are many complaints about the many empty seats at the events which have been allocated to companies, officials etc who don't even turn up. Sebastian Coe still defends those chosen few however. I feel sure there are other more deserving people who would be quite happy to pay for the seats and actually use them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Think that's why they are calling it the People's Olympic's ... cause the people will have to foot the bill for it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

If you check, the sponsors are saying they are using their seats (at least the ones they didn't give away as prizes in competitions, etc.). It's the seats allocated to the foreign olympic committees that are the majority of those that are sitting empty.

(It's probably something as boringly stupid as each countries entire olympic committee was given free seats to every event, but obviously can't attend everything. And although they're supposed to return tickets that aren't being used for resale, they probably have forms to fill in to do so, and it's more hassle than it's worth, as knowing the UK, it will be a 5 page form for each ticket you return.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Somebody point me to an Olympic year when the people did not ultimately fit the bill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Well the public build the stadiums and then tickets are sold and then the organisers all run off with the money.

The public have no choice because they are taxed, the government wins because they get tax on the profits from the organisers and the poor old working smuck gets to maybe see the Olympics on the TV.

There is a Euphoria about this Olympcs almost like a orgy before Rome burns and everyone is looking for heroes.

Tickets are the hottest thing in town and it's a great atmosphere with loads of really friendly faces and great entertainment.

It seems the country has decided to say Fuk it, Fuk all the problems we are going to party but party with sport.

Gold medalists are the new rock stars.

The bill will be dissected later but right now it's a massive climax.

And to help get the final cost of around £15 billion into perspective:

"The Bank of England will flood the market with another 50 billion pounds of cash next week."

http://uk.reuters.co...E85Q1BS20120627

Edited by Il Postino

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

And two weeks is way too short a time to run the games.

So many sports and not enough time to enjoy them.

All that investment for a two week window in which to re-coup the costs.

The games should be longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

The games should be longer but with less sports represented.

Each time a new sport is introduced then one old one should be dumped.

Too many sports means that the participating countries have a huge expense in training athletes and then getting them to the games along with a cast of thousands who look after them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Yes but if we introduce new sports no one else understands then team GB stands a better chance of winning gold medals.

Simples. :wine:

Edited by Il Postino

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Ough!!

post-7272-0-78302100-1344835117_thumb.jp

post-7272-0-40892700-1344835128_thumb.jp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

I think from a media perspective the Games have been a success, audiences have been able to watch real people trying their best with sweat and training rather than a load of dressed up silicone shallow insincere Celeb wannabees.

Sport overall is very positive, I would rather sporting heroes inspire a generation than Jordon or Russell Brand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

This is going to be one of the legacies of the Olympic Games:

With the UK withdrawing from Afghanistan, and British bases in Germany being closed, too, the public will need to get used to seeing more of the military,

"It is a really important point. We recognised we have an opportunity to set conditions for us when we are predominantly UK-based armed forces.

This has given us the opportunity to show us as professional and approachable human beings."

http://www.guardian....overy-two-years

Cut backs on the Police and the army moving back home with the threat of more riots looming, it makes common sense I guess.

Edited by Il Postino

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Watch some of the more painful and embarrassing moments athletes will be hoping to forget from London 2012:

http://www.bbc.co.uk...ympics/19230791

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Cannot play media. Sorry, this media is not available in your territory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

You see all those people running, jumping, swimming, diving, etc.

Well they are called sportsmen and women and they are competing to win the greatest prize in sport.

Just because sponsors pay for advertising does not take away the fact that the Olympics is all about sport and the crowds come to watch sport.

The Olympics is about sport and always will be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=510_1344196881

Irish commentators view on Olympic sailing!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Shipping Container Homes
      By TizMe · Posted
      GBP130k to build - I wonder what it would have cost if "normal" construction methods were used? 
    • Shipping Container Homes
      By Stocky · Posted
      The final building from the Grand Designs episode above, used 4 containers, cost GBP130k to build.
    • Thai Elite Visa Good or Bad
      By Morlar · Posted
        Does being an 'Elite' visa holder somehow exempt you from all the other paperwork hassles in Thailand? I don't think it does. Funnily enough I never see anyone singing abut how great it is either. I think those that jumped on when it was first launched many years ago were too embarrassed to tell anyone they had one. I honestly don't see any value in the visa, married or unmarried. You want a limo, jump into one of the many services available for walk in customers. You want to play golf? Well, go play golf. You need an Elite visa for that? My last annual extension took around ten minutes. So, what does the money buy you, 15 or 20 minutes at immigration? ฿100,000 annually? Yeah, value if you fly daily and would otherwise use the banknotes to light cigars. Yes, but the money is still yours. How did this small but significant point evade you.
    • Problems re-entering Singapore because of unpaid taxes?
      By Noah · Posted
      Thank you once again TizMe for your reply. I really appreciate you giving effort to help me out. As in my case, I was terminated and was given 2 weeks notice. IRAS sent me a demand letter for payment. It was also included in the letter that my former company will have to share for my tax but it was a minimal amount, which I recalled to be only 200 SGD. The last conversation I had with my HR, I remember them saying that the 200 SGD amount I mentioned earlier was deducted from my last salary. They told me that it would be paid to my tax and it was the share of the company. They added that it was standard that it be deducted from my salary. They did not hold my last salary. I don't know why but I presumed that they know for a fact that I will seek another employment and will try to pay it if I get employed again, which I tried but wasn't fortunate to get one.         Thank you Bazzoir for sharing your experience. I think you have a point and maybe it's also possible that if I try to get back Singapore, they will let me in but won't let me out if I leave without paying. I only wish to clear things because I don't really want to have a bad record in SG. I may not be able to get another job there, but I would definitely want to bring my family for a pleasure trip someday.
    • Methodologies For Learning New Languages
      By METHOS · Posted
      Just curious about what approach you all use for learning new languages and/or what you find works best for you...e.g. rote rehearsal, keyword method, mnemonics, spaced repetition with flash cards etc.? When I was studying Chinese, I started with pinyin pronunciation. From there, I focused on core vocabulary that I deemed essential for basic communication e.g. the most important words and built on from there. Once I was able to structure sentences together, I would write them out, swapping words to create new sentences etc., while learning new vocabulary in an effort to communicate other, very common and useful phrases. It wasn't until I actually started to study the character sets that I actually felt the need and saw the true benefit of writing things out, over and over again. That said, many polyglots and linguists swear by mnemonics and other methods, shunning the rote repetition methods that are often taught in schools. However, some methods just do not work well for some languages. Although I feel immersion is key, I do feel that traveling to a foreign country is no longer necessary with things like Skype and such. I purchased several sets of index cards and a box the other day, with the idea of making flashcards. I spent a great deal of time cutting the cards in half to make better use of space, only to later discover that there are programs like anki that allow me to study anywhere, anytime, without the need of having to carry along my flashcards or spend hours creating them. Decks can be downloaded and shared for all sorts of languages. I can even run the program on my smartphone. Needless to say, it is very helpful and I highly recommend it. Anyway, I find that flashcards are useful and allow me to recognize foreign words when I see them...but recalling them and/or having to recreate them from memory just isn't happening yet. I think writing things out may work better for me. I did try my hand with some mnemonics, and it does work very well...when applicable. Watching movies with foreign subs/dubs is great, but I still find that the most valuable resource is good, old-fashioned language exchange with a native speaker of the target language. Finding someone on Skype or the like that wants to improve their English and is willing to help you learn their language in return really is the best, IMO...at least until we're able to hook our brains up to a computer and download whatever we want to learn in an instant.